| 09/03/2009 |
| physical fitness |
 |
| PAUL ROSENGARD |
Got PE?
Like milk, isn’t physical education (PE) “essential” for kids? Doesn’t it contribute to their growth and development? So why are so many deprived of it?
Also like milk, there are all different kinds of PE. There’s the “Let’s sit down and talk about how important it is to be active” PE, the “My kids love to play dodgeball and kickball” PE, and the “HI, I’m Coach Blood and Guts and welcome to my extension of athletic practice” PE.
Fortunately, these examples of malpractice are going the way of the dinosaurs (previous descriptions were taken directly from the yearly plan at Jurassic Park Junior High). Today’s PE should provide:
|
 |
1. Sufficient minutes of health-promoting activity during class, and
2. Teach students the physical and behavior skills they need to stay active and make healthy choices away from class, and
3. Combined, 1 and 2 prepare students to lead healthy lifestyles into adulthood.
I believe PE can be so much more than just plain milk. It can rise to the top like sweet cream and become a symbol for all that is good about education, and what each of us want for our own children – to be healthy in body and mind, now and forever.
There’s the vision. Are you with me? Then let’s work together and remove some of the obstacles in our way:
Myth vs. reality:
“Time in physical education is time away from academic pursuits – and that’s what the kids are tested in.”
The latter is true — too bad because PE should be a part of standardized testing — but the former is false. No study has ever shown that more time in PE has a negative impact on academic achievement. The good news? Students don’t have to sacrifice their health for the core subjects — they can have their math and move it too. Need proof? Go to http://www.sparkpe.org/results.jsp
“We don’t have enough money to afford daily, quality, PE – or the credentialed teachers we need to instruct it.”
Budgets are tighter than ever. However, it’s not a money issue — never has been. There is money to spend — not much, not enough, but there IS money. Budgets are always a pie to be consumed and the issue is how do you slice it? How large a piece does PE receive - — deserve? I believe its section should be the equivalent of the other core subjects and not a penny less — and that includes equality for class size too. Class size for PE should be linked to class size averages for other subjects.
“Parents care about grade point averages and want their students in class and learning.”
A national survey of parents and teachers concluded that over 75 percent opposed eliminating PE due to budget constraints or to meet increased academic standards (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2003).
There are more myths and contradictory realities. Yet our issue is clear and the time is now. When PE programs and teachers are placed on the budgetary chopping block — speak up and garner support from the voters — your parents. Don’t wait until you’re thirsty to go to that well.
Start with the vision of what physical education could be, should be, will be with proper support. It’s that shining subject on the hill.
And while you’re at it, ask if they plan to stop serving milk in the cafeteria too…
Got PE?
Paul Rosengard is the SPARK Executive Director, a content author, presenter, researcher, and very proud to be a physical educator. For more information, visit www.sparkpe.com.
Return
Related Articles
Comments & Ratings